Відео

I know that the makers have their reasons for using the BSD-2 clause license, but Lunduke, please, tell them the story of khtml and the licenses it was under, just to be repackaged, reworked and closed by apple, google, and every other company, and they will do it again.

Torvalds didn't bring the whip and chase all the employees of the Linux Foundation out of the building - so he already stepped down and left us alone. He is just receiving his paycheck for staying silent.

GNU/Hurd soon™

It absolutely IS Communism, it's just that you have a wrong understanding of Communism because you got Western '"education".

I'm not using a browser called "ladybird", no matter how good it is.

Excellent 👏

Make sure they don't partner with Sweet Baby Inc.

Great ideas for a browser & philosophy …& then they use exclusively US-based, closed, proprietary, privacy-invasive services for their community in Microsoft GitHub & Discord. I sure as heck hope there is a goal have free software tools for their free software project else they are cutting off an entire portion of community & hurting accessibility/privacy in the process.

My 2009 laptop currently runs Debian 12 with LXDE, in under 400 MB RAM. With the 4GB it has I can browse the web, watch FullHD movies, play games, etc. Even when it runs Linux Mint with Cinnamon, taking 1.5GB RAM, there's enough left for the same things. The laptop runs great with the SSD I put in, and I'm pretty sure it will be usable for a while longer. Of course it's no longer a daily driver, which is why I don't need it for everything, but it can do a lot anyway. On my main PC I already have 64GB RAM, so I can do a lot more.😆

I would love Brave to be Chromium free like they used to be. It was founded by one of the FireFox founders.

I'm on board - until they adopt a code of conduct. Then I'm out. I admire your optimism, Bryan. We'll see.

in summary: this video is filled with bloat, with only around 20% being relevant their are other things that may also matter however, the topic of the video is linux sucks, i'd say 40% of the video should be somewhere else where it would be more relevant. the remaining 40% does not matter and is not news, or is mr. luke repeating himself there is a jarring lack of sources provided and some of the information is dubious at best and/or highly editorialized well done mr luke, you have succsesfully gotten lots of engagment out of me, next time if you take anything from what i have said, please include sources.

Then there is Gnome Web, I wish it would improve. If you are a savage then Dilo is best.

i can't believe you actually focus on the pride flag part more than the risky deals part, THAT IS INSANE.

i've just looked into the suse stuff and idk what you mean by alienate half of their users, they said that if you can't tolerate the mascot being a rainbow bow 1/12 of the year they don't want you in their community, and JUST 1 of the people in suse said people who can't are rotten flesh that they are happy they are able to cut out, and are happy the pride colours were able to expose the rot. which they said on twitter which most people won't even see. others did also say that they didn't want people who can't be inclusive in their community. 50% being alienated is incredibly skepticle.

I use Gentoo by the way and its better than ever... we're still primarily a source-based distribution!

i'm pretty sure unity isn't dead you know, and that list is from 2022. btw you're even padding the list sayying things like Snap (probably next) and hopes and dreams

what will happen to distributions of linux? well it depends and putting it all into 1 question is bad as really there are so many different distribution and they will all go in different ways. you go from 1 that seems pretty to another which is not bad but rather just an unknown, this creates a negative bias towards the ubuntu change. this order is weird as ubuntu is far bigger and more important from my view. therefore i can't see how you have styled this in a positive light. (i haven't kept up with linux for a while so idk if fedora is actually huge now or something)

fearmongering about what if's is no reason for linux sucking. virus makers and devs are in a constant "battle" there is no what if, eventually they will but the developers will also develop new protections

linux getting viruses does actually suck, finally something after so much padding even then right after you talked about how things like ubuntu are taking significant steps to combat this, if anything this would mean that linux doesn't suck as they are being proactive in case of future viruses also love how you didn't talk about why in the ubuntu section

you made this video in February how can you possibly talk about 'if trends continue to hold' when there wasn't even enough time for a trend to have started

it can suck how linux isn't getting all the supportor however much you think it should, but that is not "linux sucks" thats the situation sucks, linux can work great and have future prospects that suck. this is not the video for LF budjet complaints, this is even more padding

you talk about how open source projects aren't receiving high revenue and then say linux foundation could easily 10x their funding for them without noticing an impact, A yes they would that's 2.86 million dollars ie >1% of their revenue from the number you said (260 million)(from just gnome), when they support 1k+ projects that would be a huge investment from their perspective, B you then say instead of funding these open source projects they're funding all these other ones AGAIN LINUX IS NOT THE ONLY THING THEY DO, SH*t, ALL OPEN SOURCE SH*T

For me there is only one browser, Firefox. User since version 1.

i don't doubt the numbers you are saying for companies that violate the GPL that are members, but i would apreciate it if you actually put a source to those numbers. i don't doubt the numbers as companies such as google, meta, Microsoft... are the one on it

GPL stands for general public license ie copyleft, it means that any derivative works of a GPL must also be distributed under the same license terms, eg: company A makes a GPL product, the company B creates a derivative of that product, this product would then also have to be GPL. please include descriptions when you say a piece of jargon

You assume backend is a huge php Spaghetti file. Backend frameworks exist forever. A lot of Ajax calls CAN kill a Server more than a Single html request. You have to maintain a whole frontend Team and workflow Extra. If you have a mobile App you often have to write a slightly different api anyway. Maintaining js Apps more than 5 years becomes a pain if it gets a bit more complex. IT seems you assume mostly static pages, mostly crud Apps which are mostly forms is where a frontend adds immens complexity.

what did you ask if 2 % was the number spent that they spent, also why would they bother answering 1 lone person who seemingly (i haven't seen your other stuff) is goning to be engative about them. no answer is not affirmation as well it means you do not know. it would be supporting what you are saying if they actually responded to you with -yes that is true- but that's not what happened if i, a random person emailed some company asking if they had done some horrible thing idk child labour maybe and they did not respond that is not an affirmation that they did do it, they just didn't care enough to email back

mind giving the whole article from the register? or perhaps a link?

i would love to know where you got the numbers for the spending on ai, i didn't find that on their annual report. i also checked the 3 sections i found that were to do with ai and didn't see the number. i checked LFN and AI, LF AI & DATA and Generative AI: a legal risk or open collaboration opportunity?

Project support 64% ($171,854,065) Project infrastructure 9% ($22,584,890) Training and Certification 7% ($18,570,211) Corporate operations 6% ($17,123,359) Event support 6% ($14,602,847) Community tooling 5% ($13,529,484) Linux kernel support 2% ($7,804,150) International operations 1% ($2,960,256) that's the breakdown of the linux foundations spending for those who are interested, from their 2023 annual report

i said it earlier but the linux foundation supports over 1k projects, they support open source projects not just linux. you picked 9 from 1000+ that you didn't like or thought might be controversial

linus being 54 is irrelevant, this has just been a passion project for him for a long time, it is also not a reason why "linux sucks" if anything, it should be a good thing if he retires since under his leadership "linux sucks" right?

this is an insane amount of padding you are doing you are talking about how your the only person talking about these things again? you already spent too long doing that at the start

it would be great if you provided the actual breakdown of spending from the linux foundation instead of just saying only 2% funding towards the kernel with no other context like the breakdown of funding for everything else and what it is they are spending on

linux foundation change in funding might be shitty but that ain't a reason why linux "sucks" that is showing that the direction that company may seem a bit sketchy in terms of linux support, however it's only the amount on the linux kernal alone. looking it up i found that they are involved in lots of open source projects in general(over a thousand) and that many of these other projects they assist/work on improve the linux ecosystem.

Ladybird is our last hope.

any examples/ sources for the only negative adjectives to describe white people statement, if it were a real thing the media would have talked about it, as in the big media like fox as they love harping on about dei

more padding talking about the ubuntu change, the video is supposed to be about why linux sucks if you want to talk about it do it in a different video

is there any reason to talk about the gnome stuff, it has nothing to do with he video and is just padding out more points

Hank Hill’s browser of choice.

your people had to hide because they were responsible for things like what is going on with the tech industry in the past, and they are the ones responsible for what you are complaining about. all this hatred for the white race comes from your race.

I think there should be a serenityOS foundation that would do the same thing. Basically use 100% of its money to hire the serenityOS core maintainers as full time programmers and to hire 5 full time OS engineers with real experience with commercial OS to develop serenityOS full time. In that case, a few stretch goals would be a good thing, namely C++ 20, ECMA 262 14th edition, EXT4, OpenZFS, Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 3.0, POSIX 2017, and Single Unix Specification 2018 compliance. In my view Linux Standard Base 5.0 compatibility should only be implemented once the previous standards are implemented and working.

POG. Totally from the ground up, open-source, no BS. I have high hopes for this. I was thinking about picking up Nyxt, but this... this I need to look into first.

How does it compare to Servo?

They will need an icon........ will it be a red ladybird, or a yellow one?

Free speech not free beer needs to be the rallying cry of free software going forward. Funding is a huge problem for all open/free software

Very exciting. Have not looked too deep, looks to written in c++ which is not too surprising. Would be cool to see a project with this focus be based on a memory safety leaning language.

To quote Ellen Ripley.. " I hope you're right.. I really do.."